-By Jaya Pathak
The Viksit Bharat Gramin Rozgar Bill 2025 is a plan. This is going to help people in villages. To get the benefits of the Viksit Bharat Gramin Rozgar Bill 2025, you have to be eligible. The main benefit of this bill is that it will give people jobs and money. The key differences in the Viksit Bharat Gramin Rozgar Bill 2025 are important to know. This is because the bill has some rules. We will explain the eligibility and benefits of the Viksit Bharat Gramin Rozgar Bill 2025. This will help you understand the Viksit Bharat Gramin Rozgar Bill 2025.
A new rural employment framework
The government brought in the Viksit Bharat Gramin Rozgar Bill in 2025. This started a discussion all over the country about job guarantees, what the state is responsible for and what people in rural India want. The MGNREGA program had been important for areas for almost twenty years. It gave people wages for 100 days. They did not have to move to find work. The Viksit Bharat Gramin Rozgar Bill and the MGNREGA program are both about the government helping people. The rural areas have needs and people are complaining about delays. The Viksit Bharat Gramin Rozgar Bill is trying to improve jobs by giving people more days to work and connecting things that help people make a living. If you care about what happens to India then you should understand what the Viksit Bharat Gramin Rozgar Bill means.
A pathway toward Viksit Bharat
The Bill is going to help India become a Viksit Bharat by 2047. This is because the Bill promises to do more than give people jobs. It wants to change the villages in the run. The Bill talks about creating things that will last like roads and schools and making sure the government uses computers to do its work. The old law, which is called MGNREGA was made to help peopl who were in trouble. The new law wants to make sure that people do not get into trouble in the first place. The Bill and the idea of a Viksit Bharat are connected.
Eligibility under the Bill
Who can join the Bill is open to everyone. Any family that lives in an area can be a part of it as long as the members are grown-ups and willing to do physical work. The Bill does not say you have to earn below an amount of money or do a specific type of job. It is like the MGNREGA rule where people can choose to work. The Gram Panchayat is in charge of keeping track of the work. People can ask for work during a time of the year. The Bill is like the MGNREGA in that it lets people make their decisions.
Funding and yearly planning concerns
The new plan is good because it helps families without an income. There is a difference between this plan and MGNREGA. With MGNREGA people could get work whenever they wanted. The new plan is based on what the government plans to do each year. Some people think the new plan is better because the government can plan. Other people are worried that the new plan will make it harder for rural workers to get jobs. They are worried about the workers and the MGNREGA plan.
Guaranteed workdays expanded
What stands out is that the Bill gives people days of guaranteed work. Before households got one hundred days of work. Now they get one hundred and twenty five days. A lot of people who live in rural areas are struggling. For people who do not have a lot of money and have jobs that do not pay regularly these extra days can make a difference. The Bill can help them have food and money. The extra workdays from the Bill are important.
Seasonal flexibility to support agriculture
The law has an advantage because it is flexible with the seasons. It understands how important farming is. The Bill says that the government should stop wage work during the times for farming. This way farmers will have workers when they need to plant and harvest crops. This is a help because farmers need extra workers. The MGNREGA had some problems with this. Sometimes the daily wages it paid were so good that workers would rather do that than help farmers.
Technology-based transparency
The Bill uses technology. This means people can check who is at work using special machines. They can also use GPS to see where the projects are. Money is sent electronically. People can see what is happening on websites. All of this is done to stop people from taking money that does not belong to them. In the past people have had problems with money going missing. The Bill might be the answer because it uses technology. To be successful we need infrastructure and training. This is true in areas where the internet is not very good.
Cost-sharing between centre and states
The Bill is also bringing in a way to fund things. With the MGNREGA the central government had to pay for all of the wages and materials. Now the new system splits up the cost between the central government and the state governments. People who support this think that the states will now have control. Some people do not think this is a good idea because they think that the poorer states may not have enough money. This means the plan will not be implemented equally.
Planned infrastructure vs demand-driven work
The rural employment projects planning model is changed. It is not about doing work when people need it right now. Instead, these projects will be planned ahead of time using village and district plans. This big plan might make the projects better. It also means that when there are big problems and many people need work the projects might not be able to help them right away.
Rights and protection concerns
MGNREGA was a law that gave people rights. If officials did not give people work or paid less money than they should people could take them to court. The new Bill does not say these things clearly. These are not the same as being able to take someone to court. This thing about worker protection is open to interpretation. If the implementation is good then worker protection might get stronger. If it is not done well then worker protection will get weaker.
Gender inclusion and digitisation challenges
The Bill needs to be looked at in terms of what’s happening in rural India. Women make up a part of the people who work. The Bill should focus on making sure women are included. Digitization needs thought and depends on the internet being good and people getting training. Rural areas have a problem with not having enough staff. If they try to use computers and do not get the help they need it could be bad.
Household and welfare implications
The people who live in areas will decide if the Viksit Bharat Gramin Rozgar Bill is a good thing. Village households struggle because they do not know how much money they will make. If they get work for 125 days they will feel better. For people who live in these villages having a way to store water and make their farms stronger is a big deal. Young people do not have to move to cities if they can make a life in their villages. Reduced rights for village households is also a concern. We need to make sure that village households are taken care of. The promise of the Bill is only as good as how it is put into action. It does this by combining the idea of having a job with infrastructure for the long term. People are hoping that because the Bill promises days of work and uses digital tools it will make a difference. The Viksit Bharat Gramin Rozgar Bill 2025 is a step toward making rural employment better.
