Since illegal websites frequently make movies available on the day of their theatrical debut, the plaintiff contended that piracy constituted an immediate threat.
Jolly LLB 3 Anti-Piracy Order: HC Directs Immediate Blocking of Illegal Site
An ex-parte ad-interim injunction prohibiting over 20 rogue websites from unlawfully uploading or streaming the next Bollywood blockbuster Jolly LLB 3, which is scheduled for release on September 19, was just obtained by the Delhi High Court [Jiostar Private Limited vs. Vega Movies].
The plaintiff, Jiostar India Private Limited, who owns the film’s exclusive rights, filed the lawsuit, and Justice Tejas Karia issued the ruling. The Court ordered government agencies, such as the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and the Department of Telecommunications, as well as domain name registrars (DNRs) and internet service providers (ISPs), to guarantee the prompt banning of the designated domains.
“The apprehension of the unauthorized dissemination, telecasting, or communication of the film on the websites shall pose a significant threat to the plaintiff’s revenue streams undermining the value of the considerable investment made,” the Court observed.
Read Also: Jolly LLB 3 LIVE Review: Akshay Kumar and Arshad Warsi’s Powerful Duo
According to the Court, immediate action was required to stop irreversible damage. Jiostar petitioned the Court, claiming that since illegal websites frequently make movies available on the day of their theatrical premiere, piracy presents an immediate threat.
Jiostar is the exclusive owner of Jolly LLB 3’s intellectual property and commercialization rights through Kangra Talkies Private Limited. Websites like vegamovies.yachts, filmyzilla20.com, hdfriday.monster, and others have a history of unlawfully distributing copyrighted information without permission, according to Jiostar’s attorney.
Jiostar further cited other Delhi High Court rulings, such as Universal City Studios LLC v. Dotmovies.baby and Star India Pvt. Ltd. v. moviesverse.ac, in which the Court has granted “dynamic+ injunctions” to thwart the changing strategies of rogue websites.
Following its consideration of the arguments, the Court issued the following directives:
- Blocking and suspension: DNRs were directed to suspend and deactivate domain registrations of the listed infringing sites within 72 hours. ISPs were ordered to block access to these sites across India;
- Disclosure mandate: DNRs must submit, in sealed cover, details of domain registrants including names, email IDs, IP addresses and payment information within two weeks;
- Dynamic blocking: Jiostar was given liberty to notify additional websites discovered before or during the film’s release. These are to be blocked immediately by ISPs and registrars without fresh court orders;
- Safeguard for legitimate sites: Any website wrongly blocked may approach the Court for modification of the injunction upon undertaking not to disseminate pirated content.
The matter will next be heard on January 20, 2026.
Advocates Sidharth Chopra, Yatinder Garg, Priyansh Kohli, and Ishi Singh from Saikrishna & Associates represented Jiostar India.
Advocate Aishwarya Kane of Ira Law represented the domain registrars.
Read Also: Jolly LLB 3 Advance Booking: Akshay-Arshad’s Courtroom Drama Rakes in ₹3 Crore, 46K Tickets Sold
FAQ: Delhi High Court Blocks Rogue Websites Streaming Jolly LLB 3
1. What action did the Delhi High Court take regarding Jolly LLB 3?
The Delhi High Court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining over 20 rogue websites from illegally hosting or streaming the upcoming film Jolly LLB 3, scheduled for release on September 19, 2025.
2. Who filed the case, and what rights do they hold?
The suit was filed by Jiostar India Private Limited, which owns the exclusive intellectual property and exploitation rights for Jolly LLB 3. The company’s subsidiary, Kangra Talkies Private Limited, also holds rights related to the film.
3. Which websites are affected by the court order?
The order targets sites such as vegamovies.yachts, filmyzilla20.com, hdfriday.monster, among others, which have a history of illegally distributing copyrighted content.
4. What directions did the Court issue?
Blocking and suspension: Domain name registrars (DNRs) must suspend and deactivate infringing domains within 72 hours. ISPs are to block access to these sites across India.
Disclosure mandate: DNRs must provide details of domain registrants (names, emails, IP addresses, and payment info) in a sealed cover within two weeks.
Dynamic blocking: Jiostar can notify additional infringing websites, which must be blocked immediately without a fresh court order.
Safeguard for legitimate sites: Websites mistakenly blocked may seek modification of the injunction upon agreeing not to host pirated content.
5. Why did the Court consider this intervention necessary?
The Court noted that unauthorized dissemination of the film could cause significant revenue loss for the plaintiff and undermine the investment made. Immediate action was required to prevent irreparable harm.
6. Which precedents did Jiostar rely on?
The plaintiff cited prior Delhi High Court cases such as:
Star India Pvt. Ltd. v. moviesverse.ac
Universal City Studios LLC v. Dotmovies.baby
These cases involved dynamic injunctions to counter the adaptive strategies of rogue piracy websites.
7. Who represented the parties in the case?
Jiostar India: Advocates Sidharth Chopra, Yatinder Garg, Priyansh Kohli, and Ishi Singh from Saikrishna & Associates.
Domain Registrars: Advocate Aishwarya Kane from Ira Law.
8. When is the next hearing scheduled?
The matter is listed for further hearing on January 20, 2026.
8. Who represented the parties?
Jiostar India: Advocates Sidharth Chopra, Yatinder Garg, Priyansh Kohli, and Ishi Singh from Saikrishna & Associates.
Domain Registrars: Advocate Aishwarya Kane from Ira Law.
9. When is the next hearing?
The case is scheduled for January 20, 2026. Any updates or additional websites discovered in the meantime can be acted upon immediately as per the Court’s order.
10. What can affected websites do if blocked?
Websites blocked mistakenly can petition the Court to modify or lift the injunction, provided they undertake not to host pirated content in the future.
11. How does this impact moviegoers and the general public?
The order ensures that legal avenues remain the primary way to watch Jolly LLB 3, helping protect revenue for filmmakers and discourage piracy. It also prevents rogue websites from misleading viewers with unsafe or illegal downloads.
12. Why is this action important for the film industry?
Prevents revenue loss due to piracy.
Protects investors, distributors, and creators.
Acts as a deterrent to other piracy websites targeting upcoming releases.
Reinforces the effectiveness of dynamic injunctions to adapt to constantly changing piracy threats.
